Symonette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Symonette v. State

891 So. 2d 640, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 636, 2005 WL 176625

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Symonette v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 962 So. 2d 941 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2005·No. No. 5D04-3455·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

As an appellant, Vedrick L. Symonette, has filed numerous frivolous and repetitive pro se pleadings in this Court regarding Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 96-15522, he was ordered to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, petitions, pleadings or motions in that case. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). Appellant has failed - to file a response to the show cause order.

In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions and petitions relating to Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 96-15522. Any pleadings or papers filed in this Court regarding that case must be reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in this state. The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed not to accept any further pro se pleadings which do not comply with this requirement.

SAWAJA, C.J., ORFINGER, and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

As an appellant, Vedrick L. Symonette, has filed numerous frivolous and repetitive pro se pleadings in this Court regarding Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 96-15522, he was ordered to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, petitions, pleadings or motions in that case. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999). Appellant has failed - to file a response to the show cause order.

In order to conserve judicial resources, Appellant is prohibited from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions and petitions relating to Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 96-15522. Any pleadings or papers filed in this Court regarding that case must be reviewed and signed by an attorney licensed to practice in this state. The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal is directed not to accept any further pro se pleadings which do not comply with this requirement.

SAWAJA, C.J., ORFINGER, and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Symonette v. State, 891 So. 2d 640, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 636, 2005 WL 176625 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

891 So. 2d 640 (Symonette v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related