Symonds v. Mayo

64 Mass. 39
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1852
StatusPublished

This text of 64 Mass. 39 (Symonds v. Mayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Symonds v. Mayo, 64 Mass. 39 (Mass. 1852).

Opinion

By the Court.

Here was an inchoate attempt at arbitration which failed. The Smiths met and made their appraisement, before the submission was reduced to writing. When reduced to writing, that superseded the previous verbal agreement. After being so reduced to writing, Mr. Morris gave his opinion on the question of law, and made his award for damages to be ascertained. The previous agreement to refer to the Smiths, to appraise the damages, was waived by mutual consent, and other appraisers were appointed, who never acted. The plaintiff has declared for the damages thus awarded by the Smiths, which was by mutual consent waived and rescinded, and no other appraisal was made.

Exc eptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Mass. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/symonds-v-mayo-mass-1852.