Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Smyth

Ohio Supreme Court

Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Smyth

705 N.E.2d 366, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 345

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 3, 1999

Docket98-2479

StatusPublished

This text of 705 N.E.2d 366 (Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Smyth, 705 N.E.2d 366, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 345 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-971028. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at page 18 of the court of appeals’ opinion filed November 6,1998:

“The rule of law on which the conflict exists is whether the language ‘in an area zoned for residential use,’ as used in R.C. 519.211(B)(1)(c), means an area zoned as a residential district [1486]*1486primarily for residential use or an area which, regardless of its zoned designation, permits residences within its boundaries.”

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would accept this cause and hold it for the decision in 98-46, Campanelli v. AT & T Wireless Serv., Stark App. Nos. 1997CA00109 and 1997CA00110. Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is AT & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Beavercreek Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Oct. 9, 1998), Greene App. No. 98CA18, unreported, 1998 WL 698374.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-971028. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at page 18 of the court of appeals’ opinion filed November 6,1998:

“The rule of law on which the conflict exists is whether the language ‘in an area zoned for residential use,’ as used in R.C. 519.211(B)(1)(c), means an area zoned as a residential district [1486]*1486primarily for residential use or an area which, regardless of its zoned designation, permits residences within its boundaries.”

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., would accept this cause and hold it for the decision in 98-46, Campanelli v. AT & T Wireless Serv., Stark App. Nos. 1997CA00109 and 1997CA00110. Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is AT & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Beavercreek Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (Oct. 9, 1998), Greene App. No. 98CA18, unreported, 1998 WL 698374.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 N.E.2d 366, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/symmes-twp-bd-of-trustees-v-smyth-ohio-1999.