Symeonides v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided October 12, 2023·No. 2:23-cv-00854·Unknown

Opinion

JOSH COLE AICKLEN Nevada Bar No. 007254 Josh.Aicklen@lewisbrisbois.com Nevada Bar No. 009502 Nevada Bar No. 15468 David.Avakian@lewisbrisbois.com 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118 Telephone: 702.893.3383 Facsimile: 702.893.3789 Attorneys for Defendant TRUMP RUFFIN TOWER I, LLC, erroneously sued herein as TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL, LLC, d/b/a TRUMP INTERNATIONAL LAS VEGAS and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & TOWER LAS VEGAS; and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTELS MANAGEMENT, LLC SEBASTIAN SYMEONIDES, an Case No. 2:23-cv-00854-JAD-VCF Individual, CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND Plaintiff, PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. TRUMP RUFFIN COMMERCIAL, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company d/b/a TRUMP INTERNATIONAL LAS VEGAS and TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL & TOWER LAS VEGAS; TRUMP RUFFIN TOWER I, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company; TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTELS MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Foreign Limited-Liability Company; OTIS ELEVATOR CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through XX, inclusive, Defendants. Certain parties believe that discovery will encompass documents and information materials would cause competitive harm, raise privacy concerns, and violate confidentiality provisions set forth in various, current contracts binding on the parties. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to the entry of this Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order (“Agreed Order”) to expedite the flow of discovery materials, preserve the integrity of information that one or more parties believe is confidential, promote the prompt resolution of discovery disputes over confidentiality, facilitate the preservation of materials that may contain confidential information and trade secrets, and prevent breach of the confidential provisions set forth in contracts. For purposes of this Agreed Order, “Confidential Information” shall mean documents or other materials that one or more parties believe to include proprietary information relating to their business or personal financial information, disclosure of which might be harmful. Documents or information designated by one or more parties as “Confidential Information” pursuant to this Agreed Order governing discovery shall be without prejudice to any party’s claim, defense or contention, whether relating to discovery issues in this lawsuit or to substantive issues in this or any other lawsuit, that such documents or information do not in fact constitute trade secrets or confidential information. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term "Confidential Information" does not include information which (a) is in or becomes a part of the public domain without violation of this Agreed Order by any party to this litigation or their counsel; (b) is customarily provided by any party to this litigation to third parties without restriction on disclosure; (c) was known to a party to this litigation on a non-confidential basis prior to its disclosure to such party or their counsel in this litigation; or (d) is not otherwise subject to a restriction on disclosure and is rightfully obtained by any party or their counsel from a source other than a party in this litigation. Accordingly, in the interests of justice and to expedite discovery, the parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE that: 1. Confidential Information: To protect trade secrets, personal financial party or third party may designate documents, information, or testimony as Confidential Information under this Order as follows: The designation shall be made by clearly stamping or marking any document, including any interrogatory answer or transcript, with the word “CONFIDENTIAL.” Transcripts (or portions thereof) may be designated "CONFIDENTIAL" or "ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" (described in paragraphs 3 and 4 below) by instructing the reporter to stamp or mark the transcript (or portions thereof) within ten (10) days after it is received, and shall be treated as Attorneys' Eyes Only Information until the ten (10) day designation period has passed. In the case of electronically-stored information, a party producing Confidential Information in an electronically-stored format shall stamp the physical medium by which the information is transmitted (e.g. computer tape, computer disk, CD Rom, etc.) as “CONFIDENTIAL.” If the party to whom such electronically-stored information is produced shall create any readable report or output from such confidential data, that party shall prominently label each page of such output report as “CONFIDENTIAL.” A party, provider of documents or non-party witness may denominate any response to any written discovery request brief, motion or other material filed with the court, and any appendix, exhibit or document pertaining to such material as Confidential Information by stamping the cover or first page, “CONFIDENTIAL.” Documents produced, or to be produced, by a third-party, including but not limited to personal financial bank records, tax records, or other private documents or information, may be designated as confidential prior to their release through subpoena via a written notice to all parties. 2. Limited Disclosure and Use of Confidential Information: A person who received Confidential Information (hereinafter, “receiving person”) has a duty to preserve confidentiality, shall not make any further disclosure of it except as authorized below or by further order, and shall use it only for purposes of this case or any arbitration or mediation attached hereto as Exhibit A as a required condition precedent of receiving any Confidential Information when requested to do so by a party to the above-captioned litigation or their counsel, where said party originally created and/or possesses or controls the Confidential Information. A receiving person is defined by this Agreed Order to refer to one of to the following persons: A. Attorneys of record for the parties of this litigation; B. Designated business persons from each of the corporate parties (“Corporate Designees”) but only to the extent necessary for the conduct of this action; provided, however, that no Confidential Information shall be revealed to such persons until the conditions detailed in Paragraph 1 have been met; C. Deposition reporters; D. Independent experts, investigators, and other consultants retained by counsel; provided, however, that no Confidential Information shall be revealed to such persons until the conditions detailed in Paragraph 1 have been met; E. Associates, secretaries, paralegals, clerical and other employees of the individuals identified in subparagraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) above, to the extent reasonably necessary to render professional services in the litigation; F. A deponent during the course of his or her deposition; G. Any person who is referenced in Confidential Information; provided, however, that no Confidential Information shall be revealed to such persons until the conditions detailed in Paragraph 1 have been met; H. Witnesses or prospective witnesses in the course of investigation or in preparation for deposition, or at deposition; provided, however, that no Confidential Information shall be revealed to such persons until the conditions detailed in Paragraph 1 have been met; and I. The Court, any arbitrator, mediator or adjudicator and their personnel. 3. Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information: A producing party may designate determination that the information threatens significant competitive harm if revealed to an opposing party or other competitor. The designation shall be made in a manner similar to that provided in paragraph 1, using the words “ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 4. Further Limitations on Disclosure and Use of Attorneys Eyes Only: Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information shall be treated in all respects as "Confidential Information" under this Protective Order. In addition to the protections already contained herein, Attorneys’ Eyes Only Information shall be subject to the following additional restrictions: Attorneys’ Eyes Only

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Symeonides v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC, (D. Nev. 2023).

Symeonides v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC (Symeonides v. Trump Ruffin Commercial LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.