Symbol v. Rowley
This text of Symbol v. Rowley (Symbol v. Rowley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7498
FARRAKHAN BEY SYMBOL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN A. ROWLEY, Warden; MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary; MARTIN O'MALLEY, Governor; M. J. WILLIAM, Fiscal Accounts Clerk Manager; T. BEAL, Lieutenant; RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., Assistant Warden; MARY L. LIVERS, Ph.D.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cv-01588-BEL)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 3, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Farrakhan Bey Symbol, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Farrakhan Bey Symbol appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Symbol v.
Rowley, No. 1:08-cv-0588-BEL (D. Md. June 30, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Symbol v. Rowley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/symbol-v-rowley-ca4-2009.