Sym v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Sym v. State

564 So. 2d 479, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 940, 1990 WL 116395

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJune 15, 1990

DocketCR 89-138

StatusPublished

This text of 564 So. 2d 479 (Sym v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sym v. State, 564 So. 2d 479, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 940, 1990 WL 116395 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

Sym appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his petition for writ of habe-as corpus wherein he alleged denial of due process in a disciplinary hearing held on September 28, 1989, that resulted in 60 days’ segregation for disorderly conduct and for intentionally creating a security, safety, or health hazard. The attorney general correctly notes that the exhibits supporting the state’s “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings” do not, in any way, pertain to the proceedings subject to the petition. The attorney general requests that this cause be remanded for the state to have the opportunity to supply the proper exhibits.

Accordingly, we order that the trial court’s ruling be set aside and this cause remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Judge.

Sym appeals from the trial court’s summary denial of his petition for writ of habe-as corpus wherein he alleged denial of due process in a disciplinary hearing held on September 28, 1989, that resulted in 60 days’ segregation for disorderly conduct and for intentionally creating a security, safety, or health hazard. The attorney general correctly notes that the exhibits supporting the state’s “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings” do not, in any way, pertain to the proceedings subject to the petition. The attorney general requests that this cause be remanded for the state to have the opportunity to supply the proper exhibits.

Accordingly, we order that the trial court’s ruling be set aside and this cause remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 479, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 940, 1990 WL 116395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sym-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.