Sylvia v. Covey

12 Tenn. 297
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1833
StatusPublished

This text of 12 Tenn. 297 (Sylvia v. Covey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sylvia v. Covey, 12 Tenn. 297 (Tenn. 1833).

Opinion

Green, J.

delivered the opinion of the court.

The court erred in allowing the defendant’s demurrer. The act of 1817 authorizing the court in which the suit for freedom may be pending, ora judge, or justice in vacation, to make an order requiring a defendant to give security, or, on failure, requiring the sheriff to take and keep the plaintiff in his custody, does not take away the jurisdiction of a court of chancery in such case. ' See 1 [298]*298Ten. Rep. 478: 2 Bro. C. C. 218: 2 Wash. 121. The t, tit powers oí a court oí chancery are more ample than those of a court of law, even under this statute; and it might often be advisable to file a bill, rather than resort to the remedy provided by the act of 1811. The party may at his election resort to either mode of proceeding.

Webber, for plaintiff in error. Pillow, for defendant in error.

The decree will be reversed, and the cause remanded to the Maury circuit court to be retained there until the termination of the suit in the bill mentioned, when the costs will be disposed of according to the result of that cause, and the defendant will pay the costs of the appeal-

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. Dewoody
1 Tenn. 478 (Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity, 1809)
McLeod v. Ellis
26 P. 76 (Washington Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Tenn. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sylvia-v-covey-tenn-1833.