Sylvester v. Administrative Director of the Courts

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sylvester v. Administrative Director of the Courts. Read the opinion of the Court — 149 Haw. 486
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 9, 2021·No. SCWC-17-0000004·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 09-JUN-2021 01:31 PM Dkt. 9 OGAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

BRENT K. SYLVESTER Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS, STATE OF HAWAI‘I Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1DAA-16-00003)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Brent K. Sylvester’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on April 20, 2021, is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai‘i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 9, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sylvester v. Administrative Director of the Courts, (haw 2021).

Sylvester v. Administrative Director of the Courts (Sylvester v. Administrative Director of the Courts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.