Sylvester Constante v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 31, 2005
Docket13-04-00574-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Sylvester Constante v. State (Sylvester Constante v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sylvester Constante v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion


NUMBER 13-04-574-CR


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________ _______________


SYLVESTER CONSTANTE,                                                 Appellant,


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                      Appellee.

______________________________________________ _______________


On appeal from the 214th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________ _______________

MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



         Appellant, SYLVESTER CONSTANTE, attempts to appeal a conviction for aggravated assault. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

         On February 14, 2005, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

         On March 18, 2005, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response does not establish (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

         The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.


                                                      PER CURIAM


Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 29th day of March, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sylvester Constante v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sylvester-constante-v-state-texapp-2005.