Sylvester Barbee v. Cheri Ellis
This text of 694 F. App'x 451 (Sylvester Barbee v. Cheri Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sylvester Barbee appeals from the order of the District Court 1 granting summary judgment to defendants Cheri Ellis and Audrea Weekly in Barbee’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from conditions of his confinement while he was held at the Cum- *452 mins Unit. 2 We agree with the district court that even assuming Barbee was incarcerated under conditions that amounted to a substantial risk of harm, he has shown no jury issue whether these defendants were deliberately indifferent to that risk. See Kulkay v. Roy, 847 F.3d 637, 643 (8th Cir. 2017) (noting that an official is deliberately indifferent if she fails to respond reasonably to a known substantial risk); see also Cullor v. Baldwin, 830 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2016) (reviewing an order granting summary judgment de novo). We affirm the judgment.
. Barbee has waived his remaining claims by failing to brief them. See Dick v. Dickinson State Univ., 826 F.3d 1054, 1058 n.2 (8th Cir. 2016).
. The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerry W. Cava-neau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
694 F. App'x 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sylvester-barbee-v-cheri-ellis-ca8-2017.