Sylvester A. Ziebarth v. United States

Eighth Circuit

Sylvester A. Ziebarth v. United States

45 F.3d 434, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5560

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 1995

Docket94-1315

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.3d 434 (Sylvester A. Ziebarth v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sylvester A. Ziebarth v. United States, 45 F.3d 434, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5560 (8th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

45 F.3d 434
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Sylvester A. ZIEBARTH, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 94-1315, 94-1878, 94-2560.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 29, 1994.
Filed: Jan. 3, 1995.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Sylvester A. Ziebarth, a federal inmate, appeals the District Court's1 orders denying his two 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motions (Appeal Nos. 94-1315 and 94-1878) and his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion (Appeal No. 94-2560). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the District Court's orders are clearly correct and that an opinion would lack precedential value. Thus, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Richard H. Battey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

45 F.3d 434
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Sylvester A. ZIEBARTH, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 94-1315, 94-1878, 94-2560.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 29, 1994.
Filed: Jan. 3, 1995.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Sylvester A. Ziebarth, a federal inmate, appeals the District Court's1 orders denying his two 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motions (Appeal Nos. 94-1315 and 94-1878) and his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion (Appeal No. 94-2560). Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the District Court's orders are clearly correct and that an opinion would lack precedential value. Thus, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable Richard H. Battey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of South Dakota

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.3d 434, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sylvester-a-ziebarth-v-united-states-ca8-1995.