SYLLA v. United States

D. New Jersey

SYLLA v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey·Decided July 23, 2019·No. 2:16-cv-08124·Unknown

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

RAHEEM SYLLA, : Civil Action No. 16-8124 (ES) Petitioner, : v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND : ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Respondent.

It appearing that: l. On October 31, 2016, Petitioner Raheem Sylia (“Petitioner”) filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (D.E. No. 1). 2. On October 26, 2015, Petitioner was sentenced in this Court after being convicted of one count of carjacking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2119(€1) and (2), and one count of brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. $$ 924(c)(1)(A). 3. On February 7, 2019, while his petition was pending, Petitioner filed a motion to stay the proceeding pending the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). (D.E. No. 19). 4. On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Davis that struck down the residual clause of § 924(c} as unconstitutionally vague. Davis, 139 S. Ct. at 2336, The opinion also provided a framework to determine whether the underlying crime should be considered a crime of violence. /d. at 2325-33.

5. Inlight of this development, this Court orders the Respondent to submit a supplemental brief addressing the effect of Davis, if any, on Petitioner’s case. Additionally, the Petitioner is authorized to submit a supplemental ref on the same issue. Accordingly, IT IS this AF day of July, 2019, ORDERED that Respondent shall file a supplemental brief addressing how the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis affects its arguments, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that Petitioner may file a reply within thirty (30) days after the filing of that supplemental brief; and it is further ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to stay (D.E. No. 19), is hereby DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to Petitioner by regular U.S. mail.

s/ Esther Salas Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

RAHEEM SYLLA, : Civil Action No. 16-8124 (ES) Petitioner, : v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND : ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Respondent.

It appearing that: l. On October 31, 2016, Petitioner Raheem Sylia (“Petitioner”) filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (D.E. No. 1). 2. On October 26, 2015, Petitioner was sentenced in this Court after being convicted of one count of carjacking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2119(€1) and (2), and one count of brandishing a firearm in furtherance of a crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. $$ 924(c)(1)(A). 3. On February 7, 2019, while his petition was pending, Petitioner filed a motion to stay the proceeding pending the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). (D.E. No. 19). 4. On June 24, 2019, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Davis that struck down the residual clause of § 924(c} as unconstitutionally vague. Davis, 139 S. Ct. at 2336, The opinion also provided a framework to determine whether the underlying crime should be considered a crime of violence. /d. at 2325-33.

5. Inlight of this development, this Court orders the Respondent to submit a supplemental brief addressing the effect of Davis, if any, on Petitioner’s case. Additionally, the Petitioner is authorized to submit a supplemental ref on the same issue. Accordingly, IT IS this AF day of July, 2019, ORDERED that Respondent shall file a supplemental brief addressing how the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis affects its arguments, within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that Petitioner may file a reply within thirty (30) days after the filing of that supplemental brief; and it is further ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to stay (D.E. No. 19), is hereby DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to Petitioner by regular U.S. mail.

s/ Esther Salas Esther Salas, U.S.D.J.

SYLLA v. United States, (D.N.J. 2019).

Pincite

SYLLA v. United States (SYLLA v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related