Sylacauga Lodge, No. 200 v. McGhee

81 So. 689, 17 Ala. App. 52, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 73
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 1919·No. 7 Div. 530.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROWN, P. J.

The evidence offered by the plaintiff conclusively shows that the property sought to be recovered by this action had never been in its possession, but was adversely claimed and held by the defendant at the time the deed by the Sylacauga Fraternal Hall Association to appellant was executed and delivered. Therefore, aside from the question as to whether the description in the deed was sufficient to embrace the property in suit, the sale and conveyance as to the property so adversely held is void, and the plaintiff, relying on this conveyance, was not entitled to recover, and the court properly rendered judgment for the defendant. Ala. State Bank v. Barnes, 82 Ala. 607, 2 South. 349; Foy v. Cochran, 88 Ala. 353, 6 South. 685; Billingsley v. Harrell, 11 Ala. 775; Rust v. Elect. Supply Co., 124 Ala. 202, 27 South. 263.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sylacauga Lodge, No. 200 v. McGhee, 81 So. 689, 17 Ala. App. 52, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 73 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

81 So. 689 (Sylacauga Lodge, No. 200 v. McGhee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Isbell Nat. Bank
134 So. 810 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Sanders v. Gernert Bros. Lumber Co.
129 So. 46 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)