Sykes v. Sykes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sykes v. Sykes

138 A. 924, 101 N.J. Eq. 822, 16 Stock. 822, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 625

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 17, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the decree under review was quite justified by the evidence. We think that the evidence (which we have examined with care) established willful, continued and obstinate desertion upon the part of the defendant husband for the term of two years.

The decree will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14 .

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the decree under review was quite justified by the evidence. We think that the evidence (which we have examined with care) established willful, continued and obstinate desertion upon the part of the defendant husband for the term of two years.

The decree will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14 .

For reversal — None.

Sykes v. Sykes, 138 A. 924, 101 N.J. Eq. 822, 16 Stock. 822, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 625 (N.J. 1927).

Pincite

138 A. 924 (Sykes v. Sykes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.