Sykes v. Sykes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sykes v. Sykes

138 A. 924, 101 N.J. Eq. 822, 16 Stock. 822, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 625

DecidedOctober 17, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 138 A. 924 (Sykes v. Sykes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sykes v. Sykes, 138 A. 924, 101 N.J. Eq. 822, 16 Stock. 822, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 625 (N.J. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the decree under review was quite justified by the evidence. We think that the evidence (which we have examined with care) established willful, continued and obstinate desertion upon the part of the defendant husband for the term of two years.

The decree will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14 .

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the decree under review was quite justified by the evidence. We think that the evidence (which we have examined with care) established willful, continued and obstinate desertion upon the part of the defendant husband for the term of two years.

The decree will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 14 .

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A. 924, 101 N.J. Eq. 822, 16 Stock. 822, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sykes-v-sykes-nj-1927.