Sykes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sykes v. State

492 S.W.3d 630, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 620, 2016 WL 3418455

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 21, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103339

StatusPublished

This text of 492 S.W.3d 630 (Sykes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sykes v. State, 492 S.W.3d 630, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 620, 2016 WL 3418455 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Shedrick Sykes appeals from the motion court’s entry of judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. Ño error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this ease would serve no jurisprudential or.precedential purpose. We have, however, provided- a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Shedrick Sykes appeals from the motion court’s entry of judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. Ño error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this ease would serve no jurisprudential or.precedential purpose. We have, however, provided- a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

492 S.W.3d 630, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 620, 2016 WL 3418455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sykes-v-state-moctapp-2016.