Sykes v. Ocean Steamship Co.
This text of 93 S.E. 44 (Sykes v. Ocean Steamship Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This aetion rests upon the general law of master and servant, and, in order for the plaintiff to recover, it must appear that the master knew or ought to have known of the danger,, that the plaintiff did not know, and by the exercise of ordinary care could not have known, and that he did not have equal means with the master of knowing the danger. The petition was properly dismissed on demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 44, 20 Ga. App. 391, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sykes-v-ocean-steamship-co-gactapp-1917.