Sykes v. Bolten

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Sykes v. Bolten

466 So. 2d 38, 1985 La. LEXIS 8464

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 2, 1985

DocketNo. 85-CC-0643

StatusPublished

This text of 466 So. 2d 38 (Sykes v. Bolten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sykes v. Bolten, 466 So. 2d 38, 1985 La. LEXIS 8464 (La. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

IN RE: Sykes, Tommy R.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Stay, and Writs of Prohibition and Mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW-85-0423; Parish of Tangipahoa 21st Judicial District Court Div. “A”, No. 70,-729.

Denied.

CALOGERO and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ. Justice Lemmon further notes that if the Court of Appeal reinstated the appeal on the basis of the trial court’s lack of jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal, relator may still file a motion to dismiss in the court of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN RE: Sykes, Tommy R.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Stay, and Writs of Prohibition and Mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW-85-0423; Parish of Tangipahoa 21st Judicial District Court Div. “A”, No. 70,-729.

Denied.

CALOGERO and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ. Justice Lemmon further notes that if the Court of Appeal reinstated the appeal on the basis of the trial court’s lack of jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal, relator may still file a motion to dismiss in the court of appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 So. 2d 38, 1985 La. LEXIS 8464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sykes-v-bolten-la-1985.