Sykes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Northcarolina

822 S.E.2d 621
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 30, 2019·No. 248A18-1·Published

Opinion

Robert E. Fields, III, Attorney at Law, Samuel Pinero, II, Attorney at Law, William A. Blancato, GAL Appellate Attorney, Leon E. Porter, Attorney at Law, Ellis B. Drew, III, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, For Sykes, Susan, et al.

Elizabeth L. Winters, Attorney at Law, Chad D. Hansen, Attorney at Law, Winston-Salem, Adam H. Charnes, Attorney at Law, For Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina

D. Erik Albright, Attorney at Law, Greensboro, For Cigna Healthcare of North Carolina, Inc.

Stephen D. Feldman, Attorney at Law, Raleigh, For Medcost LLC

Jennifer K. Van Zant, Attorney at Law, Greensboro

Benjamin R. Norman, Attorney at Law, Greensboro

W. Michael Dowling, Attorney at Law

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th of January 2019 for Warren Haskel to be admitted Pro Hac Vice:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th of January 2019."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sykes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Northcarolina, 822 S.E.2d 621 (N.C. 2019).

822 S.E.2d 621 (Sykes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Northcarolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.