Syger v. Kriger

271 So. 3d 136
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 2019
DocketNo. 3D18-0450
StatusPublished

This text of 271 So. 3d 136 (Syger v. Kriger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Syger v. Kriger, 271 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*137Affirmed. See Valdes v. GAB Robins N. Am., Inc., 924 So.2d 862, 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) ("It is axiomatic that a plaintiff in a malicious prosecution case must, as an essential element of that cause of action, establish that the prior litigation giving rise to the malicious prosecution suit ended with a 'bona fide termination' in that party's favor.") (quoting Doss v. Bank of Am., N.A., 857 So.2d 991, 994 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) ); see also Union Oil of Cal., Amsco Div. v. Watson, 468 So.2d 349, 353 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) ("Where dismissal is on technical grounds, for procedural reasons, or any other reason not inconsistent with the guilt of the accused, it does not constitute a favorable termination.").

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Oil of California, Amsco Div. v. Watson
468 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Valdes v. GAB Robins North America, Inc.
924 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Doss v. Bank of America, NA
857 So. 2d 991 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 So. 3d 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/syger-v-kriger-fladistctapp-2019.