Syenite Granite Co. v. Bobb

Missouri Court of Appeals

Syenite Granite Co. v. Bobb

25 Mo. App. 185, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 288

DecidedMarch 22, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Mo. App. 185 (Syenite Granite Co. v. Bobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Syenite Granite Co. v. Bobb, 25 Mo. App. 185, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 288 (Mo. Ct. App. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment was rendered herein by the circuit court, against all the defendants. An appeal was taken from such judgment by Charles H. Bobb, Abraham Siegel, William H. Swift, and Cora Bobb Taylor, December, 4, 1886, returnable at the present term of this court. The appellants failing to canse a transcript to be filed in this court, as required by law, the respondent produces a transcript, and moves that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, and that a personal judgment be rendered for the costs of this appeal against the parties appealing. No cause being shown against the motion, it is sustained.

Ordered, that the judgment rendered herein, by the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, be affirmed, and that the respondent recover of the four defendants,' appealing, the costs of this appeal.

All the judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment was rendered herein by the circuit court, against all the defendants. An appeal was taken from such judgment by Charles H. Bobb, Abraham Siegel, William H. Swift, and Cora Bobb Taylor, December, 4, 1886, returnable at the present term of this court. The appellants failing to canse a transcript to be filed in this court, as required by law, the respondent produces a transcript, and moves that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, and that a personal judgment be rendered for the costs of this appeal against the parties appealing. No cause being shown against the motion, it is sustained.

Ordered, that the judgment rendered herein, by the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, be affirmed, and that the respondent recover of the four defendants,' appealing, the costs of this appeal.

All the judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Mo. App. 185, 1887 Mo. App. LEXIS 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/syenite-granite-co-v-bobb-moctapp-1887.