Syed Javed Shere v. Dimintry Kudryavtsev

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 8, 2024
Docket01-23-00890-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Syed Javed Shere v. Dimintry Kudryavtsev (Syed Javed Shere v. Dimintry Kudryavtsev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Syed Javed Shere v. Dimintry Kudryavtsev, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 8, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00890-CV ——————————— SYED JAVED SHERE, Appellant V. DIMITRY KUDRYAVTSEV, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1202746

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Syed Javed Shere, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s

October 26, 2023 final judgment. Appellant has neither paid the required fees nor

established indigence for purposes of costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP.

P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals,

and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No.

15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). On December 20, 2023, appellant was notified that

this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellate costs were not paid, or indigence

was not established, by January 19, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). Appellant

did not adequately respond.

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for the

preparation of the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). On December 29,

2023, appellant was notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal if appellant did

not submit written evidence that he had paid or made arrangements to pay the fee

for the preparation of the clerk’s record by January 29, 2024. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b), (c). Appellant did not adequately respond.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Syed Javed Shere v. Dimintry Kudryavtsev, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/syed-javed-shere-v-dimintry-kudryavtsev-texapp-2024.