Sydnor v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Federal Circuit

Sydnor v. Merit Systems Protection Board

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 2012

Docket2011-3128

StatusUnpublished

This text of Sydnor v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Sydnor v. Merit Systems Protection Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sydnor v. Merit Systems Protection Board, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

REGINALD L. SYDNOR, Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. ____________________

2011-3128 ______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. CB7521100003-T-1. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

REGINALD L. SYDNOR, of Haverford, Pennsylvania, pro se.

JEFFREY A. GAUGER, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, Merit Systems Protection Board, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were JAMES M. EISENMANN, General Counsel, and KEISHA DAWN BELL, Deputy General Counsel. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 12, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI