Sydney v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

259 A.D.2d 484, 684 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2057

This text of 259 A.D.2d 484 (Sydney v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sydney v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, 259 A.D.2d 484, 684 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LaTorella, J.), dated June 8, 1998, which granted the plaintiffs motion to strike their answer unless they produced certain repair and maintenance records within 30 days of service of a copy of the order with notice of entry.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly granted the plaintiffs motion (see, Herrera v City of New York, 238 AD2d 475; Soto v City of Long Beach, 197 AD2d 615, 616). Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Soto v. City of Long Beach
197 A.D.2d 615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Herrera v. City of New York
238 A.D.2d 475 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D.2d 484, 684 N.Y.S.2d 894, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sydney-v-port-authority-of-new-york-new-jersey-nyappdiv-1999.