Sydney v. Macfadden Newspaper Publishing Corp.

215 A.D. 653
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We conclude that the article complained of is not libelous per se, and that it requires the extrinsic facts which are alleged in the complaint to make it so. In these circumstances the article is not actionable unless special damage be alleged. The judgment and order appealed from should, therefore, be affirmed, with costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days upon payment of said costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, McAvoy and Martin, JJ.; Clarke, P. J., and Martin, J., dissent. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days from service of order upon payment of said costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sydney v. Macfadden Newspaper Publishing Corp., 215 A.D. 653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

215 A.D. 653 (Sydney v. Macfadden Newspaper Publishing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tanzer v. Crowley Publishing Corp.
240 A.D. 203 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)