Sydney M. Siegel & Co. v. Lieberthal
This text of 3 A.D.2d 679 (Sydney M. Siegel & Co. v. Lieberthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action by an employer to recover damages for breach of a contract of employment, and for other relief, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action on the ground that they [680]*680do not state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 A.D.2d 679, 160 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sydney-m-siegel-co-v-lieberthal-nyappdiv-1957.