Sydney M. Siegel & Co. v. Lieberthal

3 A.D.2d 679, 160 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6609

This text of 3 A.D.2d 679 (Sydney M. Siegel & Co. v. Lieberthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sydney M. Siegel & Co. v. Lieberthal, 3 A.D.2d 679, 160 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

In an action by an employer to recover damages for breach of a contract of employment, and for other relief, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the first and third causes of action on the ground that they [680]*680do not state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Ughetta and Hallman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 A.D.2d 679, 160 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sydney-m-siegel-co-v-lieberthal-nyappdiv-1957.