Sycamore Grove Homeowners Ass'n v. Moorish Holy Temple of Science

Fourth Circuit

Sycamore Grove Homeowners Ass'n v. Moorish Holy Temple of Science

539 F. App'x 287

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 26, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1467

StatusPublished

This text of 539 F. App'x 287 (Sycamore Grove Homeowners Ass'n v. Moorish Holy Temple of Science) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sycamore Grove Homeowners Ass'n v. Moorish Holy Temple of Science, 539 F. App'x 287 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dianne Michele Carter El-Bay, the self-proclaimed administrator/trustee of Moorish Holy Temple of Science, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing her notice of removal of the underlying state foreclosure action, and denying reconsideration. Carter El-Bay has failed to demonstrate that she is authorized to litigate on behalf of Moorish Holy Temple. Accordingly, we deny her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dianne Michele Carter El-Bay, the self-proclaimed administrator/trustee of Moorish Holy Temple of Science, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing her notice of removal of the underlying state foreclosure action, and denying reconsideration. Carter El-Bay has failed to demonstrate that she is authorized to litigate on behalf of Moorish Holy Temple. Accordingly, we deny her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 F. App'x 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sycamore-grove-homeowners-assn-v-moorish-holy-temple-of-science-ca4-2013.