SWW v. State
This text of 833 So. 2d 877 (SWW v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
S.W.W., a Juvenile, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Andrea D. England (Ft.Lauderdale), Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., SHEVIN, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
S.W.W., a juvenile, appeals an adjudication of delinquency finding him guilty of willfully interrupting or disturbing a school in violation of section 877.13, Fla. Stat. (2001). We reverse the adjudication. The state did not establish that the juvenile "deliberately acted to create a disturbance." S.H.B. v. State, 355 So.2d 1176, 1179 (Fla.1977). The record does not support a finding that the juvenile acted "with the intention that his behavior impede the successful functioning" of the school or that he acted "with reckless disregard of the effect of his behavior." Id.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of acquittal for violation of section 877.13.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
833 So. 2d 877, 2003 WL 46748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sww-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.