Swortfiguer v. White

California Supreme Court

Swortfiguer v. White

66 P. 80, 6 Cal. Unrep. 778

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 23, 1901

DocketS. F. No. 2732

StatusPublished

This text of 66 P. 80 (Swortfiguer v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swortfiguer v. White, 66 P. 80, 6 Cal. Unrep. 778 (Cal. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

TEMPLE, J.

It appearing that two appeals have been taken from the same judgment by the plaintiff, and that no question is raised as to the validity of the first appeal, it is, therefore, on motion, ordered that the second appeal, taken October 20, 1900, be dismissed. It is further ordered, on motion of appellant, that said appellant may complete the record of the first appeal by supplying a properly certified copy of the notice of appeal.

We concur: McFarland, J.; Henshaw, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEMPLE, J.

It appearing that two appeals have been taken from the same judgment by the plaintiff, and that no question is raised as to the validity of the first appeal, it is, therefore, on motion, ordered that the second appeal, taken October 20, 1900, be dismissed. It is further ordered, on motion of appellant, that said appellant may complete the record of the first appeal by supplying a properly certified copy of the notice of appeal.

We concur: McFarland, J.; Henshaw, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 P. 80, 6 Cal. Unrep. 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swortfiguer-v-white-cal-1901.