Swords v. West

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Swords v. West

132 S.E. 778, 35 Ga. App. 247, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 667

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 14, 1926

Docket17090

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 132 S.E. 778 (Swords v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swords v. West, 132 S.E. 778, 35 Ga. App. 247, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 667 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The evidence, together with the legal deductions and inferences arising therefrom, did not demand the verdict directed. There were disputed issues of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.

2. There is no merit in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial not dealt with above.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI