Swords v. West

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Swords v. West

132 S.E. 778, 35 Ga. App. 247, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 667

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 14, 1926·No. 17090·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The evidence, together with the legal deductions and inferences arising therefrom, did not demand the verdict directed. There were disputed issues of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.

2. There is no merit in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial not dealt with above.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. The evidence, together with the legal deductions and inferences arising therefrom, did not demand the verdict directed. There were disputed issues of fact which should have been submitted to the jury.

2. There is no merit in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial not dealt with above.

Judgment reversed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Swords v. West, 132 S.E. 778, 35 Ga. App. 247, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 667 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

132 S.E. 778 (Swords v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related