Swogger v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Swogger v. Maxwell

208 N.E.2d 138, 2 Ohio St. 2d 230, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 457, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 534

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 9, 1965·No. No. 39283·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this action, petitioner is raising the identical issues raised by him and considered and disposed of by this court in Swogger v. Maxwell, Warden (decided July 1, 1964), 176 Ohio St. 415. There have been no changes in the law which warrant a reconsideration of such issues.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this action, petitioner is raising the identical issues raised by him and considered and disposed of by this court in Swogger v. Maxwell, Warden (decided July 1, 1964), 176 Ohio St. 415. There have been no changes in the law which warrant a reconsideration of such issues.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Swogger v. Maxwell, 208 N.E.2d 138, 2 Ohio St. 2d 230, 31 Ohio Op. 2d 457, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 534 (Ohio 1965).

Pincite

208 N.E.2d 138 (Swogger v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related