Swofford v. Department of Highways

13 Ct. Cl. 259
West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided October 6, 1980·No. CC-79-174·Published

Opinion

GARDEN, JUDGE:

At approximately 7:30 p.m. on March 16, 1979, the claimant was driving south on W.Va. Route 2 north of Parkersburg when the right front tire struck a pothole, damaging the tire and wheel. The claimant seeks to recover damages in the sum of $135.20.

The State is neither the insurer nor the guarantor of the safety of motorists traveling on its highways. Adkins v. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645, 46 S.E.2d 81 (1947). For the respondent to be held liable for damage caused by a pothole, it must be proven that the respondent had either actual or constructive knowledge of the hole and a reasonable amount of time to take suitable corrective action. Davis v. Dept. of Highways, 11 Ct.Cl. 150 (1977). The claimant did not meet that burden of proof, and, therefore, this claim must be denied.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swofford v. Department of Highways, 13 Ct. Cl. 259 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1980).

13 Ct. Cl. 259 (Swofford v. Department of Highways) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Adkins v. Sims
46 S.E.2d 81 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1947)
Davis v. Department of Highways
11 Ct. Cl. 150 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1976)