Swofford v. Adult & Family Services Division

768 P.2d 945, 95 Or. App. 394
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 22, 1989
Docket2-2401-AZ7675-2; CA A47060
StatusPublished

This text of 768 P.2d 945 (Swofford v. Adult & Family Services Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swofford v. Adult & Family Services Division, 768 P.2d 945, 95 Or. App. 394 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Adult and Family Services Division that denied her application for Aid to Dependent Children for July, 1987.

Petitioner, a law student during the regular school year, was employed in July at Oregon Legal Services under a work-study grant from the United States Department of Education. She asserts that, contrary to federal law, AFSD included the grant in her income. We disagree. Under OAR 461-04-840 and OAR 461-04-885, AFSD must count work-study grants for graduate students as income. Although federal law requires AFSD to exclude work-study grants from a graduate student’s income if they are “obtained and used under conditions that preclude their use for current living costs,” 45 CFR 233.20(a)(3) (iv)(B), petitioner used the grant for living expenses in July. Federal law does not preclude that use, because the expenses were “related to attendance or continued attendance at [an institution of higher learning].” 20 USC § 1091(a)(5). Consequently, OAR 461-04-840 and OAR 461-04-885, as applied here, are not inconsistent with federal law. See Pahle v. AFSD, 72 Or App 606, 696 P2d 1135 (1985).

Petitioner’s remaining assignments of error are without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pahle v. Adult & Family Services Division
696 P.2d 1135 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
768 P.2d 945, 95 Or. App. 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swofford-v-adult-family-services-division-orctapp-1989.