Swoboda v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Swoboda v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.

991 S.W.2d 211, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 1999 WL 308730

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 1999·No. No. 75003·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s “temporary or partial” award to employee. Employer’s arguments address its liability and not the extent or duration of the award. This court, therefore, has jurisdiction for this appeal. Hoenig v. Corrigan Brothers, Inc., 983 S.W.2d 526, 529 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). The decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s “temporary or partial” award to employee. Employer’s arguments address its liability and not the extent or duration of the award. This court, therefore, has jurisdiction for this appeal. Hoenig v. Corrigan Brothers, Inc., 983 S.W.2d 526, 529 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). The decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value.

The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Swoboda v. Schnuck Markets, Inc., 991 S.W.2d 211, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 693, 1999 WL 308730 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

991 S.W.2d 211 (Swoboda v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related