Switzman v. Aperion Catering Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Switzman v. Aperion Catering Corp.

9 Misc. 2d 343, 172 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3089

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Misc. 2d 343 (Switzman v. Aperion Catering Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Switzman v. Aperion Catering Corp., 9 Misc. 2d 343, 172 N.Y.S.2d 868, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3089 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of the evidence introduced by plaintiffs to establish specific acts of negligence which caused their injuries, it was error to submit the case to the jury on the theory of res ipsa loquitur (Bressler v. New York R. T. Corp., 270 N. Y. 409; Bailey v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 277 App. Div. 798, affd. 302 N. Y. 717; Goodheart v. American Airlines, 252 App. Div. 660).

The judgment, as amended, should be unanimously reversed upon the law and the facts, and new trial granted, with $30 costs to appellants to abide the event.

Pette, Hart, and Brown, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI