Switzerland Green v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bus Co.

44 N.E.3d 220, 26 N.Y.3d 1061, 23 N.Y.S.3d 145
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 2015·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs; motion of defendants Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bus Company and Isael Reyes for summary judgment denied; and certified question not answered as unnecessary. On this record, whether the emergency doctrine precludes liability presents a question of fact and, therefore, summary judgment for defendants Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bus Company and Isael Reyes was inappropriate.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Switzerland Green v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bus Co., 44 N.E.3d 220, 26 N.Y.3d 1061, 23 N.Y.S.3d 145 (N.Y. 2015).

44 N.E.3d 220 (Switzerland Green v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bus Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Freedman
2021 NY Slip Op 03646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
VanEpps v. Mancuso
2020 NY Slip Op 05359 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Powers v. Kyong Kwan Min
2017 NY Slip Op 716 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Weston v. Castro
138 A.D.3d 517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Maisonet v. Roman
139 A.D.3d 121 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)