Switzer v. Keller

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 10, 2019·No. 77394·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LEO SWITZER, No. 77394 Appellant,

vs.

PATRICK KELLER,

Respondent.

Ar4'1 EU?.

CL.E.:q1

SY_

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal.

However, the stipulation is not signed by counsel of record for respondent. Accordingly, this court elects to treat the stipulation as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. Cause appearing, the motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.'

C.J.

cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Persi Mishel, Settlement Judge Law Offices of Janet S. Markley Purdy & Anderson Christensen Law Offices, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

'Given this dismissal, the motion filed on May 3, 2019, is denied as moot.

SUPREME COURT OF

/ 7,0 11,3

NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4e.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Switzer v. Keller, (Neb. 2019).

Switzer v. Keller (Switzer v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.