Switzer v. Keller
This text of Switzer v. Keller (Switzer v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LEO SWITZER, No. 77394 Appellant, vs. PATRICK KELLER, Respondent. Ar4'1 EU?. CL.E.:q1
SY_
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal. However, the stipulation is not signed by counsel of record for respondent. Accordingly, this court elects to treat the stipulation as a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. Cause appearing, the motion is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). It is so ORDERED.'
C.J.
cc: Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Persi Mishel, Settlement Judge Law Offices of Janet S. Markley Purdy & Anderson Christensen Law Offices, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk
'Given this dismissal, the motion filed on May 3, 2019, is denied as moot. SUPREME COURT OF
/ 7,0 11,3 NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4e.,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Switzer v. Keller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/switzer-v-keller-nev-2019.