Switzer v. Dean

510 F. App'x 294
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2013·No. No. 12-2274·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommenda[295] tion of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Switzer v. Dean, No. 5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW, 2012 WL 3315084 (W.D.Va. Aug. 10 & Oct. 12, 2012). We deny Switzer’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Switzer v. Dean, 510 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2013).

510 F. App'x 294 (Switzer v. Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colebrooke v. T-Mobile
D. South Carolina, 2021
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna
D. South Carolina, 2021