Switchmen's Union v. Southern Pacific Co.

385 U.S. 803, 17 L. Ed. 2d 49
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1966·Published·Cited by 37 cases

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion to treat the application for extension of time as a petition for a writ of certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Switchmen's Union v. Southern Pacific Co., 385 U.S. 803, 17 L. Ed. 2d 49 (1966).

385 U.S. 803 (Switchmen's Union v. Southern Pacific Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Plate v. State
925 P.2d 1057 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 1996)
United States v. Gregory A. McFarland
34 F.3d 1508 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Williams-Davis
821 F. Supp. 727 (District of Columbia, 1993)
United States v. Olano
934 F.2d 1425 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Bulls v. United States
490 A.2d 197 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1985)
United States v. Elmer Wayne Crisco
725 F.2d 1228 (Ninth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. George N. Milhim
702 F.2d 522 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)
United States v. Phillips
664 F.2d 971 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Robert A. Johnson v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden
650 F.2d 122 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)
Seese v. Volkswagenwerk
648 F.2d 833 (Third Circuit, 1981)
Seese v. Volkswagenwerk A. G.
648 F.2d 833 (Third Circuit, 1981)
United States v. Robert Evans, Jr.
635 F.2d 1124 (Fourth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Victor Harvey Smith
621 F.2d 350 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Barone
83 F.R.D. 565 (S.D. Florida, 1979)