Swiss Forest Homeowners Ass'n v. Ole Olsen, Ltd.

38 A.D.2d 619, 326 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 1, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 619 (Swiss Forest Homeowners Ass'n v. Ole Olsen, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swiss Forest Homeowners Ass'n v. Ole Olsen, Ltd., 38 A.D.2d 619, 326 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in the County of Sullivan on May 24, 1971, which dismissed the appellant’s complaint upon the ground that the appellant as a membership corporation had no personal cause of action against the respondent and, accordingly, lacked standing to pursue the action. The record establishes that the appellant has no cause of action against the respondent, although its individual members may have causes of action against the respondent. The appellant contends that because the complaint concerns causes of action involving pollution or so-called environmental wrongs ” it is actually seeking to protect the public interest and should be permitted to maintain the action. However, upon the present record the respondent and the individual members of the appellant had such personal and direct relationships that the appellant cannot be considered as asserting causes of action for the protection of the' public at large. The present record does not establish any reason for departing from the traditional concept that a plaintiff can have no cause of action unless it either has or will suffer injury as the result of acts by the defendant. The decision of Special Term correctly determined that the complaint should be dismissed. Special Term noted in its decision that many of the persons allegedly represented by the appellant have already commenced action against the defendant for the relief claimed in the complaint herein. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kamin v. Koren
621 F. Supp. 444 (S.D. New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 619, 326 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swiss-forest-homeowners-assn-v-ole-olsen-ltd-nyappdiv-1971.