Swiskey v. Lamotta

170 A.D.2d 416

This text of 170 A.D.2d 416 (Swiskey v. Lamotta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swiskey v. Lamotta, 170 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered November 22, 1989, granting defendant’s motion for a protective order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Over two-thirds of the requests set forth in plaintiffs’ "First Notice to Produce” are palpably overbroad or well beyond the scope of permissible discovery. In such a case, it is not the court’s responsibility to prune the offensive document, and plaintiffs’ notice was properly vacated in its entirety (Bohlen Capital Holdings v Standard Coal Co., 90 AD2d 476).

We find plaintiffs’ remaining arguments to be without merit, and note that, in any event, plaintiff may yet serve a proper demand in accordance with CPLR 3101 and 3120. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bohlen Capital Holdings, S.A. v. Standard Coal Co. N.V.
90 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 A.D.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swiskey-v-lamotta-nyappdiv-1991.