Swisher v. Woodcock

772 So. 2d 611, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16147, 2000 WL 1819470
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 12, 2000
DocketNo. 1D99-3302
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 772 So. 2d 611 (Swisher v. Woodcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swisher v. Woodcock, 772 So. 2d 611, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16147, 2000 WL 1819470 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s order awarding custody of the minor child to Appellees, the child’s paternal grandparents. In its decision rendered August 3, 1999, the trial court relied upon the standards articulated in cases construing section 61.13(7), Florida Statutes. Subsequent decisions of this court and the Florida Supreme Court have declared that stat[612]*612ute facially unconstitutional.1 The trial court did not have the benefit of these opinions.

We, therefore, remand the case for the trial court’s reconsideration in light of the Richardson decision, without prejudice to Appellees to amend their petition to insti-" tute further proceedings, including, but not limited to, a dependency action pursuant to chapter 39, Florida Statutes. During the pendency of these proceedings, the minor child will remain in Appellees’ physical custody.

BOOTH, MINER and KAHN, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. State
772 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
772 So. 2d 611, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16147, 2000 WL 1819470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swisher-v-woodcock-fladistctapp-2000.