Swisher v. Muncy
This text of 854 F.2d 1317 (Swisher v. Muncy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
854 F.2d 1317
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard P. SWISHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R.M. MUNCY, Warden, James E. Johnson, Assistant Warden,
Major Jack, and other unknown "John Doe"
defendants, in their individual and
official capacities,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7733.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 28, 1988.
Decided Aug. 4, 1988.
Richard P. Swisher, appellant pro se.
Alan Katz, Office of Attorney General, for appellees.
Before K.K. HALL, ERVIN and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Swisher v. Muncy, CA-86-728-N (E.D.Va. Nov. 10, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
854 F.2d 1317, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10878, 1988 WL 83388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swisher-v-muncy-ca4-1988.