Swisher v. Illinois Central Railroad

55 N.E. 555, 182 Ill. 533
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 16, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 55 N.E. 555 (Swisher v. Illinois Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swisher v. Illinois Central Railroad, 55 N.E. 555, 182 Ill. 533 (Ill. 1899).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

By the final order of the Appellate Court for the Second District the ultimate facts found were that the injury was the result of the risks incident to plaintiff’s employment; that the accident occurred in the day time, when lamps were not required on the switch of defendant, and that the injury was occasioned by the negligence of a fellow-servant of plaintiff directly co-operating with him and in the same line of employment. These finding's are all as to ultimate facts and not as to evidentiary facts, and hence are conclusive on this court. (Caywood v. Farrell, 175 Ill. 480, and authorities there cited.) The ultimate facts as found by the Appellate Court, covering the entire right of recovery, as averred in the pleadings in this case, having been by the Appellate Court adjudicated adversely to the plaintiff, the appellant here, and being all with reference to facts the determination of which is conclusive of the action, we are precluded by the statute from a further consideration of the case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Juagment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Lawler
94 Ill. App. 36 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 N.E. 555, 182 Ill. 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swisher-v-illinois-central-railroad-ill-1899.