Swint v. Central Railroad
This text of 75 Ga. 888 (Swint v. Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The presiding judge being dissatisfied with the verdict, and having granted a first new trial, one among many grounds of the motion being that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence, this court will not control his discretion in so doing; nor will it closely scan any views of the law expressed by the judge in granting the new trial, the presumption being that, on the second hearing, he will correct his own errors, if any.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 Ga. 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swint-v-central-railroad-ga-1886.