Swint v. Brooks
This text of Swint v. Brooks (Swint v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6063
STEVEN LEVON SWINT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH BROOKS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (CA-04-341)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 6, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Levon Swint, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Steven L. Swint appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Swint v. Brooks,
No. CA-04-341 (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal issues are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Swint v. Brooks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swint-v-brooks-ca4-2005.