Swint v. Auld

Ohio Supreme Court

Swint v. Auld

2009 Ohio 3715, 911 N.E.2d 292, 122 Ohio St. 3d 349

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 4, 2009

Docket2008-2283

StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 3715 (Swint v. Auld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Swint v. Auld, 2009 Ohio 3715, 911 N.E.2d 292, 122 Ohio St. 3d 349 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Sullivan v. Anderson Twp., 122 Ohio St.3d 83, 2009-Ohio-1971, 909 N.E.2d 88, and the cause is remanded for consideration of appellant’s assignments of error.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the negative.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Sullivan v. Anderson Twp., 122 Ohio St.3d 83, 2009-Ohio-1971, 909 N.E.2d 88, and the cause is remanded for consideration of appellant’s assignments of error.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 3715, 911 N.E.2d 292, 122 Ohio St. 3d 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swint-v-auld-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack