Swinson v. Warden
This text of 75 A.D.3d 433 (Swinson v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Determination of respondent New York State Division of Parole, dated June 24, 2008, which, after a hearing, revoked petitioner’s parole and imposed a delinquent time assessment to hold petitioner to the maximum expiration date of his sentence, a total of two years, 11 months and 26 days, based upon a violation of his conditions of release, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County [Ruth E. Smith, J.], entered November 12, 2009), dismissed, without costs.
Substantial evidence supports respondent’s determination that petitioner violated conditions of his parole (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d [434]*434176 [1978]). The day after he was released to parole supervision, petitioner was arrested, refused to cooperate with police and caused physical injury to a police officer. The imposition of a time assessment to the maximum expiration date of the sentence was not improper. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 A.D.3d 433, 903 N.Y.S.2d 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swinson-v-warden-nyappdiv-2010.