Swinson v. Warden

75 A.D.3d 433, 903 N.Y.S.2d 235
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 A.D.3d 433 (Swinson v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swinson v. Warden, 75 A.D.3d 433, 903 N.Y.S.2d 235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Determination of respondent New York State Division of Parole, dated June 24, 2008, which, after a hearing, revoked petitioner’s parole and imposed a delinquent time assessment to hold petitioner to the maximum expiration date of his sentence, a total of two years, 11 months and 26 days, based upon a violation of his conditions of release, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County [Ruth E. Smith, J.], entered November 12, 2009), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports respondent’s determination that petitioner violated conditions of his parole (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d [434]*434176 [1978]). The day after he was released to parole supervision, petitioner was arrested, refused to cooperate with police and caused physical injury to a police officer. The imposition of a time assessment to the maximum expiration date of the sentence was not improper. Concur—Andrias, J.E, Friedman, McGuire, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Muldrow v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision
110 A.D.3d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A.D.3d 433, 903 N.Y.S.2d 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swinson-v-warden-nyappdiv-2010.