Swinson v. Jones

31 S.E.2d 592, 198 Ga. 327, 1944 Ga. LEXIS 397
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 6, 1944
Docket14991.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 31 S.E.2d 592 (Swinson v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Swinson v. Jones, 31 S.E.2d 592, 198 Ga. 327, 1944 Ga. LEXIS 397 (Ga. 1944).

Opinion

Wyatt, Justice.

Jones filed a suit in Laurens superior court against Swinson and two other named defendants, in which he sought an injunction, a decree of title in him to certain property, and a judgment for the value of timber cut and removed from the described premises. The defendants other than Swinson were later stricken by amendment. While the ease was thus pending, a processioning proceeding was instituted to establish the disputed line between the tracts of land owned by the parties. The line was thus established and finally adjudicated. See Swinson v. Jones, 66 Ga. App. 598 (18 S. E. 2d, 646). Thereafter, on the trial of the instant case in the superior court, the only matter submitted to the jury was the issue as to the value of the timber cut. The verdict and the judgment entered thereon were simply for money, the other features of the case having been disposed of in Swinson v. Jones, supra. The only judgment herein excepted to is a money judgment. Held:

kSince all of the equity features originally contained in the petition were eliminated before the ease was submitted to a jury, and since the only judgment complained of is one for the value of timber cut, the ease as presented to this court is simply a law case and not one involving title to land or equitable relief, and therefore the Court of Appeals, and not this court, has jurisdiction. See Cochran v. Stephens, 155 Ga. 134 (116 S. E. 303); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Koehler, 161 Ga. 934 (132 S. E. 64); Coats v. Casey, 162 Ga. 236 (133 S. E. 237); Byrd v. Piha, 169 Ga. 115 (149 S. E. 699); Martin v. Deaton, 172 Ga. 557 (158 S. E. 331); Brightwell v. Oglethorpe Telephone Co., 176 Ga. 65 (166 S. E. 646); Gilbert Hotel v. Black, 192 Ga. 641 (16 S. E. 2d, 435). Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aultman v. T. F. Taylor Fertilizer Works, Inc.
184 S.E.2d 155 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
City of Columbus v. Atlanta Cigar Co.
140 S.E.2d 267 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Tribble v. Smith
68 S.E.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
McCowen v. Aldred
67 S.E.2d 478 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Miller v. Ray
64 S.E.2d 449 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Graham v. Lynch
52 S.E.2d 850 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Swinson v. Jones
33 S.E.2d 376 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 S.E.2d 592, 198 Ga. 327, 1944 Ga. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swinson-v-jones-ga-1944.