Home/Supreme Court/Swinson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.

Swinson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.

293 U.S. 546, 55 S. Ct. 123, 79 L. Ed. 650, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 126
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Swinson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 295 U.S. 767 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 22, 1934·No. No. 383·Published

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the [547]*547Eighth Circuit granted.

Messrs. Tom Davis and Ernest A. Michel for petitioner. Messrs. Warren Newcome, Samuel H. Cady, and William T. Faricy for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swinson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co., 293 U.S. 546, 55 S. Ct. 123, 79 L. Ed. 650, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 126 (1934).

293 U.S. 546 (Swinson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.