Swinney v. State
This text of 16 Ind. 309 (Swinney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action by The State against Thomas W. Swinney and others, upon a recognizance. The defendant demurred to the complaint, but his demurrer was overruled and he excepted. Issues of fact were then made [310]*310and submitted to the Court, who found for the plaintiff, and, over a motion for a new trial, rendered judgment, &c. In this case, the record fails'to show that a copy of the recognizance was filed with the complaint; and for that reason the proceedings must be held defective. Price v. The Grand Rapids, &c. Railroad Co., 13 Ind. 58; McClasky v. The Same Company, ante, p. 96. These cases decide that “ The rule, that when a pléading is founded upon a written instrument, the original, or a copy thereof, must be filed with the pleading, is imperative.” 2 R. S., § 78, p. 44.
The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 Ind. 309, 1861 Ind. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/swinney-v-state-ind-1861.